FOCUS
China struggles
to satisfy oil demand
High oil prices and low economic
growth are likely to depress any increase in world oil demand this year. The one market that appears to buck the trend
is China,
where demand seems to be rising at a healthy 5 per cent a year: nearly four
times the rate most forecasters predict for the rest of the world in 2003. Assessing Chinese demand is difficult in the
absence of reliable official figures.
Some of the rise in China’s
demand is more likely to be stockpiling in advance of the expected US-led war
with Iraq. China is nevertheless attracting
growing attention from oil exporters as one of the world’s most desirable and
dynamic markets.
Imports on the rise
Much of the immediate attention
on China
is focused on the recent rise in crude-oil imports. During the whole of 2002, China appears
to have imported 1.4 mn bpd of crude: a rise of more
than 15% over 2001. Last November,
imports even touched 1.8 mn bpd before falling
seasonally in advance of February’s lunar new-year holiday. Economic growth for 2002 was reported at a
healthy 7%. Growth in oil demand,
however, may have been significantly lower than the economic and oil import
numbers appear to suggest.
|
Table A
|
|
China: supply, demand, & trade
balance, 2002
|
|
|
Volume
(th bpd)
|
|
Production
|
3
400
|
|
Imports
|
|
|
Crude
|
1
400
|
|
Products
|
410
|
|
Exports
|
|
|
Crude
|
90
|
|
Products
|
100
|
|
Net trade (imports)
|
1
620
|
|
Apparent demand
|
5
020
|
|
Source: Pearl
Oil
|
The lack of reliable
official statistics on Chinese demand means that it has normally to be
estimated from data on production and net trade. These suggest demand of just over 5 mn bpd in 2002 (see Table A). This figure ignores oil smuggled in both
directions across China’s
borders. The principal trade in bootleg
oil is the import of refined products into China’s most rapidly growing
provinces in the south. The net effect
of smuggling may be to add another 200,000 bpd to China’s apparent demand.
The other main complication in arriving at a figure for demand is
the lack of any proper data on stock levels.
Some of China’s oil
buying late in 2002 was undoubtedly to build up inventories in advance of any
disruption in supplies later this year as a result of war in the Middle East,
from where China
obtains 56% of its crude oil (see Table B).
Growing stockpiles
During 2002, China’s two
main state oil companies, PetroChina and Sinopec, raised their stock cover from 10 to 15 days’
forward consumption, resulting in a stockbuild of
some 24 mn bbl.
Strategic crude stocks amounted to about 75 mn
bbl in January 2003, with a similar volume held in refined products. Buying for stock has continued this year,
with increasing emphasis on China’s
principal non-Middle Eastern supply source, Africa
(see Table B).
Taking the effects of stockbuilding and
smuggling into account, China’s
actual product consumption in 2002 appears to have been about 5.1 mn bpd, of which nearly 4.6 mn
bpd was refined domestically and the remainder imported, officially or otherwise. A similar calculation for 2001 suggests
apparent demand of 4.9 mn bpd, giving annual growth
of 0.2 mn bpd, or 4.1%. Growth of a similar magnitude looks likely
during 2003.
Meeting oil
demand
Western estimates generally put China’s crude
distillation capacity at just over 4.5 mn bpd. This figure covers some 94 refineries
operated by PetroChina and Sinopec
plus a foreign joint-venture plant at Dalian. In addition to the above, China has unspecified numbers of
small, simple distillation units, many of which operate illegally (see
‘The Month in Brief’, July 2002).
Capacity utilization rates are nevertheless high and the entire system
is under increasing strain.
|
Table B
|
|
China: crude-oil imports, 2002
|
|
|
Volume
(th bpd)
|
Share
(%)
|
|
Middle East
|
|
|
|
Iran
|
217
|
17.9
|
|
Kuwait
|
29
|
2.4
|
|
Oman
|
164
|
13.6
|
|
Qatar
|
28
|
2.3
|
|
Saudi Arabia
|
175
|
14.5
|
|
UAE
|
13
|
1.1
|
|
Yemen
|
46
|
3.8
|
|
Others
|
7
|
0.6
|
|
Total
|
679
|
56.2
|
|
Africa
|
|
|
|
Angola
|
77
|
6.4
|
|
Congo
|
13
|
1.1
|
|
Nigeria
|
16
|
1.3
|
|
Others
|
167
|
13.8
|
|
Total
|
273
|
22.6
|
|
Others
|
257
|
21.3
|
|
Total
|
1
209
|
100.0
|
|
NB: totals rounded
|
|
Source: World Oil
Trade, 2002
|
The
short-term solution is for China
to import more refined products: a task made easier by the growing surplus of
refinery capacity elsewhere. in Asia
(see ‘Focus’, August 2002). The
government prefers, however, to import more crude and to manufacture products
domestically. The state oil companies,
on the other hand, lack the resources to build new refineries quickly enough,
and China’s
record in attracting foreign refinery investors has been mixed, to say the
least. In 1996, Total took a 20% share
of the new 100,000bpd Wepec joint-venture refinery at
Dalian, China’s first such venture with an overseas
refiner. No sooner had the refinery
opened in October of that year than Total and its Chinese partners were
embroiled in disputes about whether the products could be exported or not.
Two years earlier, Arco had obtained a 9.9% stake in the 160,000bpd Zhenhai refinery when the government floated 25% of the Zhenhai Refining and Chemical Company on the Hong Kong
Stock Exchange. In 1996, the US company increased its shareholding. It was not, however, offered a seat on the
board or any active role in Zhenhai’s
management. Several other companies
tried to develop refinery schemes in conjunction with China’s state
oil companies, but the result was usually a series of protracted negotiations
ending in no agreement. Some foreign
firms with no refining background, including a Hong Kong
property company, tried to develop new refineries: again, without success. Foreign interest in China’s
downstream sector has not entirely disappeared, but the emphasis now appears to
be on petrochemicals or refined products retailing. Late last year, Shell announced approval for
a $4.3bn petrochemical complex in Canton
after several years of negotiations. BP
meanwhile has been investing in schemes to make a range of chemicals including
ethylene, purified terephthalic acid (PTA) and acetic
acid. Both companies also want to develop
retailing networks in China.
More refineries needed
China’s refining industry is
dominated by two state-owned, vertically-integrated oil giants, PetroChina and Sinopec. These were originally the state upstream and
downstream companies, respectively, but were reorganized as
vertically-integrated entities in 1998.
The new firms were re-established as regional monopolies: PetroChina in northern China and Sinopec
in the south, but since then, they have started to compete on each other
territories. Foreign competition is
scheduled to follow as part of the terms for China’s entry to the World Trade
Organization (WTO).
Both PetroChina and Sinopec
appear determined to keep out competitors in their regional heartlands for as
long as possible. Last year, Sinopec overpaid heavily for a small refinery in China simply to
keep PetroChina out of its territory. Company officials hinted at the time that
foreign refinery investors would receive a similarly hostile reception. Two other national oil companies, state oil
trader, Sinochem and the China National Offshore Oil
Company (CNOOC), also plan forays into domestic refining. Sinochem already
has a share in the Wepec joint-venture and wants to
acquire more downstream capacity. Its
ambitions may nevertheless exceed its budget, especially since it also wants to
move into the upstream sector. CNOOC,
which produces most of China’s
offshore oil, has announced plans for a 240,000bpd refinery at Huizhou in Canton,
but it too is in danger of dissipating its energies in space. It has ambitious plans to be an international
gas producer, LNG importer, chemical producer and petrol retailer inside China.
Chinese refiners have three main issues to face over the next few
years. First of all, they need to raise
crude distillation capacity in order to keep pace with demand. Secondly, they need to improve their
operating efficiency in order to compete in the deregulated market environment
required from next year onwards as a result of China’s WTO membership. Thirdly, they must invest heavily in
upgrading units to enable them to satisfy domestic demand for cleaner fuels.
China’s
main refinery system is already operating close to nameplate capacity. The only thing preventing widespread product
shortages is the presence of about 80 small crude distillation units outside
the main system. Whilst the 95 principal
refineries have a combined capacity of 4.5 mn pd, the remaining 80 or so between them only account for a
further 0.9 mn bpd.
Many of the latter are units of less than 10,000 bpd and a significant
proportion of this subsidiary capacity is unusable. Even the main refining system includes
several plants ranging in size from 2,000–6,000 bpd. Most of these are simple pipestills
located on oilfields, well away from markets.
The majority of Chinese refineries, in fact, are in the northern half of
the country where most of the oil is produced, rather than in the south where
most of the demand growth is.
Closure of the small
plants is required not only for reasons of operating efficiency but also for
environmental reasons since they are major sources of groundwater- and
air-pollution. Their high operating
costs are a drain on both Sinopec and PetroChina, which both face competition from imported
refined products from 2004. The
government has traditionally protected its state refineries from cheaper
imports by stringent import quotas, but these are due to disappear next year as
part of the WTO entry-process. This is
undoubtedly a reason why the two main state oil companies are reluctant to
embark on major programmes of refinery expansion.
Even if crude distillation capacity does not rise sharply, upgrading
capacity will almost certainly have to. China faces the
need to improve the quality of its refined products just as its crude oil slate
is changing. Sulphur levels pose a particular
challenge. Chinese demand for
low-sulphur products is rising just as the supply of domestically-produced
sweet crude is reaching its upper limits.
Thus, more low-sulphur products must be made using imported crudes, and these tend to be sour crudes
from the Persian Gulf. China’s
refiners are trying to buy time by raising their purchases of sweet crudes from Africa, but
most of the increase in crude demand over the longer term will have to come
from Middle Eastern imports. China’s
desulphurization capacity is currently less than half the world average. It will also need more reforming capacity to
process the increasing naphtha volumes produced by running more Gulf crudes, along with extra alkylation
and isomerization units to meet the demand for
increased octane levels in motor spirit.
Sinopec, PetroChina,
CNOOC, and foreign refiners alike may decide to risk as little of their
investment capital as possible until it becomes clear how much of China’s
increased demand can be met by product imports from 2004 onwards. It looks increasingly unlikely, for instance,
that either CNOOC’s Huizhou
refinery or a new 200,000bpd unit planned by Sinopec
at Qingdao
will be built before 2010. PetroChina and Sinopec plan
between them to increase distillation capacity by only 410,000 bpd between now
and 2005. In the same period, demand is
likely to increase by at least 600,000 bpd.
One short-term solution, however, may be beginning to emerge. Sinochem has just
signed a processing deal with Taiwanese refiner Formosa Petrochemical under
which the Chinese state trader will supply crude oil to Formosa’s Mailiao refinery and take back refined products. Another processing deal was signed in 2002
with Taiwan’s
other refiner, the Chinese Petroleum Corporation (CPC). Here PetroChina
supplies CPC’s Kaohsiung
refinery with crude from its own production in Sudan in return for light products
(see ‘The Month in Brief’, September 2002). Refiners in the Republic
of Korea and Japan also have
spare capacity and further Chinese deals could follow.
More oil or more gas?
Another way of alleviating
pressure on China’s
refinery system is to substitute some of the refined product demand with
natural gas. Two of the main areas where
this could happen are in heavy industry and power generation. Chinese refineries are already unable to meet
domestic demand for heavy fuel oil (HFO) and at least one state trading company
has increased its contract volumes for fuel oil imports for 2003. Iranian exports of HFO to China will go
up by 40% this year to 65,000 bpd. Most
of China’s
product imports are accounted for by HFO (see Table C).
|
Table C
|
|
China: product import quotas, 2002
|
|
|
Volume
(th
tonnes)
|
|
Naphtha
|
1300
|
|
Gasoline
|
200
|
|
Jet fuel
|
1
600
|
|
Gasoil
|
1
000
|
|
Waxy oil
|
900
|
|
HFO
|
17
000
|
|
Total
|
22
000
|
|
Source: Chinese State
Economic & Trade Commission
|
Gas
consumption is set to rise sharply thanks in part to
higher domestic production, but mainly as a result of a number of large new
import schemes involving both pipeline gas and LNG. Gas at present accounts for
only 3% of China’s
primary energy consumption, compared with oil’s share of nearly 28% (see
Table D). In 2010, gas is
supposed to be up at the 10% mark. By
that time, China
will have begun to import LNG. The first
import terminal is due to come into operation in 2005. There should also be at least one major new
gas trunk-line connecting the Tarim
Basin in western China with the
cities of the east. Further transmission
lines are proposed by CNOOC to connect gas fields on the continental shelf with
the mainland. Cross-border pipeline
links are being discussed with Russia,
Turkmenistan, and Kazakhstan, but progress is slow, and without a
well-developed transmission system, gas will not be able to substitute for oil
as quickly as China’s
planners want..
|
Table D
|
|
China: primary energy balance, 2001
|
|
Fuel
|
Consumption
|
|
|
(mn toe)
|
(%)
|
|
Coal
|
520.6
|
62.0
|
|
Oil
|
231.9
|
27.6
|
|
Hydro-electricity
|
58.3
|
6.9
|
|
Natural gas
|
24.9
|
3.0
|
|
Nuclear power
|
4.0
|
0.5
|
|
Total
|
839.7
|
100.0
|
|
Source: BP’s Statistical
Review of World Energy, 2002
|
Slow
progress with the transmission system may not be the only factor inhibiting the
substitution of oil by natural gas. The
government is also anxious to see gas make substantial inroads into the coal
market, which at present makes up 62% of the country’s primary energy
balance. Coal’s pollution problems far
exceed those of oil both in terms of sulphur and carbon emissions. Most of the mines are uneconomic and the
government wants to shut large numbers of smaller pits. Gas cannot replace substantial tranches of oil and coal together. If the decision is to use it primarily as a
substitute for coal, the shortage of refining capacity will return once more to
haunt the oil industry.